From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Martinez v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 2005
24 A.D.3d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

7293.

December 8, 2005.

Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated March 30, 2004, terminating petitioner from his employment as a New York City Police Officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Doris Ling-Cohan, J.], entered October 28, 2004) dismissed, without costs.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ., concur.


The hearing officer's findings that petitioner solicited and took cash from two motorists after he had stopped them and threatened to issue summonses to them for purported traffic violations, was supported by substantial evidence ( see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180), including the duly credited testimony of the two complaining motorists ( see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness ( see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 NY2d 32).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Martinez v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 2005
24 A.D.3d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Martinez v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERTO MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND W. KELLY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 186 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
806 N.Y.S.2d 195

Citing Cases

Cyrus v. O'Neill

The dismissal of petitioner from his employment with the Police Department does not shock the judicial…