From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Marciano v. Roldan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 2002
294 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-10709

Submitted January 24, 2002.

May 13, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated August 26, 1999, which upheld a determination of the District Rent Administrator that the tenant was entitled to treble damages for a rent overcharge, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated September 12, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Lindenbaum Young, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Alan H. Young of counsel), for appellant.

Marcia P. Hirsch, New York, N.Y. (Dawn Ivy Schiller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the determination is annulled.

The determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) was arbitrary and capricious (see CPLR 7803). The DHCR failed to consider the parties' settlement of a prior rent overcharge proceeding which it had approved (see 9 NYCRR 2520.13). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the petition.

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Marciano v. Roldan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 2002
294 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Marciano v. Roldan

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JACOB MARCIANO, appellant, v. PAUL A. ROLDAN, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Lido v. Ny. Sta. Div. Hous.com

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly granted the petition to annul,…

In re Executive Towers at Lido

The petitioners failed to meet their burden of proving, inter alia, that the rents in their apartment…