From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 2004
9 A.D.3d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

July 8, 2004.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994 and maintains a law office in Latham, Albany County.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


By decision of this Court dated June 14, 2001, respondent was suspended for two years, which suspension was stayed upon condition that his escrow accounts are properly maintained and he provides semiannual reports by a certified public accountant ( 284 AD2d 719).

As permitted by the decision, respondent now applies to terminate the suspension period. His application establishes that he has complied with the conditions of the stayed suspension and that he took and passed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination during the suspension period. Petitioner does not oppose the application.

We grant respondent's motion and terminate the period of suspension, effective immediately ( see e.g. Matter of Sullivan, 307 AD2d 642).

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that the period of the stayed suspension imposed by this Court's decision dated June 14, 2001, is terminated, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 8, 2004
9 A.D.3d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Mann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MATTHEW J. MANN, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 8, 2004

Citations

9 A.D.3d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
779 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the Third Judicial Dep't v. Mann (In re Mann)

We further note the lack of proof that respondent's misconduct stemmed from any venal intent. We have also…

Attorney Grievance Comm. for Third Judicial Dep't v. Mann (In re Mann)

We further note the lack of proof that respondent's misconduct stemmed from any venal intent. We have also…