From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Lucid

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 15, 2002
807 A.2d 809 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

D-218 September Term 2001

October 15, 2002


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-398, concluding that ROWLAND V. LUCID, JR., of MORRISTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law) by practicing law while ineligible to do so by reason of failure to pay his annual assessment to the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROWLAND V. LUCID, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Lucid

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 15, 2002
807 A.2d 809 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Lucid

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ROWLAND V. LUCID, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 15, 2002

Citations

807 A.2d 809 (N.J. 2002)
807 A.2d 809

Citing Cases

In re Weil

See, e.g., In re Austin, 198 N.J. 599 (2009) (during one-year period of ineligibility, attorney made three…

In re Block

excuse that she had not received the CPF's letters about her ineligibility was deemed improbable and viewed…