From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Lindsay v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2006-01875.

May 23, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to respond to the petitioner's request pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6). Application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ruperto Lindsay, Fallsburg, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the Appellate Division does not have subject matter jurisdiction ( see CPLR 506 [b]; 7804 [b]).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Lindsay v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Lindsay v. People

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUPERTO LINDSAY, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4090
814 N.Y.S.2d 545