From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Laffey v. Laffey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 2001
289 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2001-11001, 2001-08708

Argued December 18, 2001.

December 31, 2001.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal, by permission, is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Brennan, J.), entered September 21, 2001, as, in effect, vacated a temporary order of protection of the same court, dated August 2, 2001, which, inter alia, suspended the father's visitation with the parties' child.

Mark P. Isaacs, Valley Stream, N.Y., for appellant.

Dale A. Black-Pennington, Forest Hills, N.Y., for respondent.

Paul B. Guttenberg, Syosset, N.Y., Law Guardian for the child.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, SANDRA L. TOWNES, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the temporary order which, inter alia, suspended the father's visitation with the parties' child. The monitored visitation is in the best interests of the child (see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167; Matter of Obey v. Degling, 37 N.Y.2d 768).

The parties' remaining contentions are either not properly before this court or without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., ADAMS, TOWNES and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Laffey v. Laffey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 2001
289 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Laffey v. Laffey

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF LORI LAFFEY, Appellant, v. ANGELO LAFFEY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 787

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Henderson v. Henderson

Moreover, Family Court failed to state the facts it deemed essential to its decision that the structure of…