Opinion
No. 668, 2002.
Submitted: April 22, 2003.
Decided: April 28, 2003.
Appeal from the Board of Bar Examiners of the State of Delaware
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
Appeal dismissed.
Unpublished opinion is below.
IN THE MATTER OF NICOLE C. KENNEDY No. 668, 2002. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: April 22, 2003. Decided: April 28, 2003.
ORDER
This 28th day of April, 2003, on consideration of the briefs of the parties, it appears to the Court that:
1) Nicole C. Kennedy, an unsuccessful bar applicant, appeals from a decision of the Board of Bar Examiners denying her request to review her answers to the 2002 Delaware Bar Examination. She contends that the absence of meaningful review of her test scores violates procedural and substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
2) This Court has repeatedly considered and rejected similar arguments, most recently in Applicant No. 26 v. Bd. of Bar Examiners, and we continue to find no violation of procedural or substantive due process in the manner in which the Delaware Bar Examination is graded and reviewed.
780 A.2d 252 (Del. 2001).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition to review the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners is DENIED.