From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahl v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2005
24 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-06296.

December 5, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of Police of the County of Nassau, dated July 16, 2004, which, after a hearing, denied benefits to the petitioner pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c with regard to a work absence on January 31, 2003.

Before: Crane, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, there is ample medical evidence in the record to support the conclusion that his absence from work on January 31, 2003, was unrelated to a line-of-duty injury which he suffered years earlier. Moreover, the hearing officer did not err in accepting the opinion of a police department physician rather than the conflicting view of the petitioner's treating orthopedic surgeon with regard to the cause of the petitioner's condition ( see Matter of Pirrone v. Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, 448; Matter of Segura v. City of Long Beach, 230 AD2d 799, 800; Matter of Flynn v. Zaleski, 212 AD2d 706, 708). Accordingly, the determination is supported by substantial evidence ( see e.g. Matter of O'Hara v. Bigger, 228 AD2d 507, 508; Matter of Meehan v. County of Tompkins, 219 AD2d 774, 775).


Summaries of

Kahl v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 5, 2005
24 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Kahl v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONALD KAHL, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
805 N.Y.S.2d 120