From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Kabas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2006
30 A.D.3d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-10758.

April 25, 2006.

MOTION by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law on the ground that he has been disbarred upon his conviction of a felony. Respondent was admitted to the bar on October 1, 1980 at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department as Jan Bernard Kabas. The respondent submitted an affidavit dated December 29, 2005, wherein he tendered his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law ( see 22 NYCRR 691.9).

Rita E. Adler, Hauppauge ( Nancy B. Gabriel of counsel), for petitioner.

Kase Druker, Garden City ( James O. Druker of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, MILLER, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT


On August 24, 2005, a felony complaint was filed in the District Court, Nassau County, charging the respondent with two counts of attempted disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree, pursuant to Penal Law §§ 110.00 and 235.22, a class E felony. On September 9, 2005, the respondent pleaded guilty before the Honorable Christopher G. Quinn to one count of attempted disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree in satisfaction of the charges. During the course of his plea allocution, the respondent specifically admitted that on August 18, 2005, he sent indecent material over the internet to someone he believed to be a minor. The communication regarded sexual conduct for the respondent's benefit.

Judiciary Law § 90 (4) mandates that an attorney's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys upon his or her conviction of a New York State felony. Accordingly, the resignation proffered by the respondent is rejected and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

On the Court's own motion, a conservator is appointed to inventory the files of the respondent and to take such action as is deemed proper and advisable to protect the interests of the respondent's former clients.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Jan B. Kabas, admitted as Jan Bernard Kabas, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Jan B. Kabas, admitted as Jan Bernard Kabas, shall comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Jan B. Kabas, admitted as Jan Bernard Kabas, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Jan B. Kabas, admitted as Jan Bernard Kabas, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f); and it is further,

Ordered that the affidavit of resignation dated December 29, 2005, tendered by the respondent, Jan B. Kabas, admitted as Jan Bernard Kabas, is rejected in view of his automatic disbarment; and it is further,

Ordered that on the Court's own motion, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (g), Catherine Sammartino, Esq., 67 The Helm, East Islip, New York, 11730, is appointed as conservator to inventory the files of the respondent and to take such action as is deemed proper and advisable to protect the interests of the respondent's former clients.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Kabas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2006
30 A.D.3d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Kabas

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAN B. KABAS (Admitted as JAN BERNARD KABAS), an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3088
814 N.Y.S.2d 661

Citing Cases

In re William Genger

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of…

In re Heberling

Respondent was served with this motion but no response has been submitted to the Court. Having been convicted…