From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jonathan M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-03332, 2001-03333, 2001-03334

Submitted May 30, 2002.

June 18, 2002

In three related neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Law Guardian appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of three orders of disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Kings County (Lopez-Torres, J.), all dated April 16, 2001, as, upon a joint fact-finding order of the same court (Segal, J.), dated January 12, 2001, determining that the children were neglected, directed the Administration of Children's Services to expeditiously place all of the children in the same foster home.

Monica Drinane, New York, N.Y. (Patricia S. Colella of counsel), Law Guardian for the children, nonparty-appellant pro se.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the orders of disposition are reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, before a different Judge, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

We agree with the Law Guardian that the Family Court in this matter erred in issuing the dispositional orders without first holding a dispositional hearing. The Family Court Act directs that a dispositional hearing be held as a condition precedent to the entry of a dispositional order (see Family Ct Act § 1052[a]; Matter of Michael V. v. James M., 83 N.Y.2d 178, 183; Matter of Jeffrey M., 226 A.D.2d 1114). Here, the failure to conduct a dispositional hearing limited the Family Court's ability to make an informed judgment as to the dispositional remedy which would be in the best interests of the children (see Family Ct Act § 1045, 1047, 1052[a]; Matter of Michael V., supra; Matter of Lewis T., 249 A.D.2d 646, 647; Matter of Scott M. v. Janna C., 237 A.D.2d 603, 605).

Since the Family Court erred in failing to hold a dispositional hearing, the matter must be remitted for such a hearing (see Matter of Michael V., supra; Matter of Edward L., 250 A.D.2d 853).

O'BRIEN, J.P., H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jonathan M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jonathan M

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN M. (ANONYMOUS). COMMISSIONER OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

Steuben Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Emma P.-T. (In re Kayla K.)

Moreover, the court erred in issuing the dispositional orders of protection without first holding a…

In re Kayla K.

Moreover, the court erred in issuing the dispositional orders of protection without first holding a…