From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jerry Lineberger v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 17, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-17

In the Matter of Jerry LINEBERGER, Petitioner,v.Norman BEZIO, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.


Jerry Lineberger, Attica, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A correction officer observed petitioner engaged in a physical altercation with another inmate and, as a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, assault, engaging in violent conduct and possessing a weapon. At a January 2010 tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to fighting and engaging in violent conduct, and a hearing was then conducted on the remaining charges. Thereafter, he was found guilty of all the remaining charges; however, the assault and weapon charges were dismissed on administrative appeal and the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Although the petition raised a question of substantial evidence, petitioner has abandoned that claim by not raising it in his brief ( see Matter of Garcia v. Smith, 78 A.D.3d 1362, 1363 n., 910 N.Y.S.2d 388 [2010] ). In any event, petitioner's guilty plea to the charges of fighting and engaging in violent conduct precludes him from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence as to those charges ( see Matter of Lamere v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 768, 927 N.Y.S.2d 803 [2011]; Matter of Surdis v. Walsh, 301 A.D.2d 900, 752 N.Y.S.2d 925 [2003] ). To the extent that it was properly before us, petitioner's sole remaining contention, that he was not provided adequate employee assistance, has been reviewed and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

PETERS, J.P., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jerry Lineberger v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 17, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jerry Lineberger v. Bezio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jerry LINEBERGER, Petitioner,v.Norman BEZIO, as Director…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1293 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
932 N.Y.S.2d 738
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8248

Citing Cases

Watson v. Fischer

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges and the determination was…

Rosario v. Fischer

This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. We confirm. Inasmuch as petitioner pleaded guilty to refusing a…