From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 2005
21 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-10167.

August 22, 2005.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated October 25, 2004, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Borofsky, S.M.), dated September 21, 2004, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition, without prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action.

Russell Jenkins, Cambria Heights, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Before: Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father's objection to the order of the Support Magistrate. Contrary to the father's contention, a court cannot reduce or annul child support arrears accrued before the making of an application to modify child support ( see Family Ct Act § 451; Miller v. Miller, 308 AD2d 541; O'Connor v. Curcio, 281 AD2d 100, 102; Howfield v. Howfield, 250 AD2d 573; Matter of McCaffrey v. McCaffrey, 134 AD2d 430, 431).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 2005
21 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUSSELL JENKINS, Appellant, v. DENISE McKINNEY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 22, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6512
799 N.Y.S.2d 904

Citing Cases

Salman v. Salman

The wife's first application for maintenance and child support was December 5, 2011 ( seeDomestic Relations…

R.I. v. T.I.

The Court notes that an award of maintenance and child support is effective as of the date of application…