From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jeffrey M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 30, 2004
6 A.D.3d 1156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

CAF 03-02201.

Decided April 30, 2004.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered January 31, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order revoked a prior order suspending judgment, terminated respondents' parental rights and transferred the guardianship and custody rights of the child to petitioner.

MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN, LAW GUARDIAN, FREDONIA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

THOMAS A. DOREY, MAYVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

WILLIAM F. DUNCANSON, LAW GUARDIAN, JAMESTOWN, FOR JEFFREY M., JR.

Before: PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order revoking a prior order suspending judgment based upon her failure to comply with the conditions of that order, terminating her parental rights and transferring the guardianship and custody rights of the child to petitioner. The record supports Family Court's determination that respondent violated the conditions of the suspended judgment despite petitioner's due diligence ( see Matter of Craig L., 2 A.D.3d 1461). The contention of respondent that her parental rights were improperly terminated because she is legally incapacitated due to her status as a minor is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not preserved for our review ( see Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora, 202 A.D.2d 984, 985). In any event, that contention lacks merit. After making a finding of permanent neglect, the court is "concerned only with the best interests of the child" ( Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147; see Matter of Saboor C., 303 A.D.2d 1022, 1023). Contrary to respondent's further contention, the court, consistent with the goal of expedited permanency planning under the Adoption and Safe Families Act, properly made immediate findings of neglect and due diligence ( see L 1999, ch 7; see generally Matter of Marino S., 293 A.D.2d 223, 227, affd 100 N.Y.2d 361, cert denied ___ US ___, 124 S Ct 834).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jeffrey M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 30, 2004
6 A.D.3d 1156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jeffrey M

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF JEFFREY M., JR. CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 30, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 1156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Robin G.

AThe adoption of ASFA by the State Legislature in 1999 served two important and related policies: the…

In re Seth M.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order adjudicating her children who are the subject of this…