From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jean-Laurent v. Erlbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 2005
17 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-00990.

April 18, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prevent the respondent William Erlbaum, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from proceeding with the trial of the charges contained in indictment No. 701/04, in a criminal action entitled People v. Jean-Laurent, commenced in the Supreme Court, Queens County, which was consolidated with indictment No. 2269/03, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Phillip Jean-Laurent, East Elmhurst, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Maria E. Rodi of counsel), respondent pro se.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jean-Laurent v. Erlbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 2005
17 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jean-Laurent v. Erlbaum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PHILLIP JEAN-LAURENT, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM ERLBAUM, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Jean-Laurent v. Conway

More critically, for habeas purposes, petitioner raised this argument or its equivalent in two Article 78…

In re Jean-Laurent v. Erlbaum

Decided October 25, 2005. Appeal from 2d Dept: 17 AD3d 589. Motion for leave to appeal…