In the Matter of James

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF CLYDE R. JAMES, BANKRUPT. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL W…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 22, 1972

470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311.

December 22, 1972.

Burton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicksberg, Kushner Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.

Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Lynn Anderson Koller, (argued), of Newmark Koller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.

Appeal from orders of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Albert C. Wollenberg, Judge.

Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F. Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal. 1972).

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.