From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ingle v. Ingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 2005
19 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-08962.

June 6, 2005.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated June 12, 2003, which, after a hearing, extended a temporary order of protection against him until June 12, 2004.

Neal D. Futerfas, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Salvatore C. Adamo, Patchogue, N.Y., for respondent.

Diane P. Foley, Garrison, N.Y., Law Guardian for the children.

Before: Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from has expired by its own terms. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Levande v. Levande, 308 AD2d 450, 451).

Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( cf. Anders v. California, 386 US 738; Matter of Mejias v. Aleman, 10 AD3d 421).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ingle v. Ingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 2005
19 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ingle v. Ingle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHEUNG C. INGLE, Respondent, v. PATRICK O. INGLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 905

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Ellwanger v. Ellwanger

The order appealed from has expired by its own terms. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic…

Milman v. Shehupak

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have reviewed the record and agree…