From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Houten v. Hevesi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 2005
20 A.D.3d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97254.

July 7, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Peter M. Cordovano, Highland, for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.


Petitioner worked as a motor equipment operator for approximately 27 years. On December 13, 2000, petitioner was injured when the road under the dump truck he was operating collapsed. His application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied following a hearing on the basis that he was not permanently incapacitated from performing his duties ( see Retirement and Social Security Law § 63). This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The expert for respondent New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System testified that his examination of petitioner and his review of petitioner's MRI and EMG test results failed to discover objective medical evidence to support a conclusion that petitioner was permanently incapacitated from performing his duties as a motor equipment operator. Although petitioner's treating physician presented a contrary medical opinion, respondent Comptroller was free to credit the opinion of the Retirement System's expert over that of petitioner's physician ( see Matter of Stern v. Hevesi, 12 AD3d 831, 832; Matter of Johnson v. Hevesi, 10 AD3d 835, 836). Thus, as the determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record, it will not be disturbed ( see Matter of Stern v. Hevesi, supra at 831-832; Matter of De Carolis v. McCall, 272 AD2d 824, 824-825).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Houten v. Hevesi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 2005
20 A.D.3d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Houten v. Hevesi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH VAN HOUTEN, Petitioner, v. ALAN G. HEVESI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 7, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Van Houten v. Hevesi

Decided December 22, 2005. Appeal from 3d Dept: 20 AD3d 643. Motion for leave to appeal…

Amedio v. Hevesi

Notably, in this proceeding, this Court is limited to deciding whether there is substantial evidence for the…