From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hom v. Zullo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-05396.

Decided May 10, 2004.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), dated May 20, 2003, which denied his petition, inter alia, for a change of custody of the parties' daughter.

George Hom, Westbury, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Jane Zullo, Uniondale, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Myrka A. Gonzalez, Sayville, N.Y., Law Guardian for the child.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father's petition for a change of custody since he did not make an evidentiary showing which would warrant a change of custody ( see generally Matter of Coutsoukis v. Samora, 265 A.D.2d 482).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., TOWNES, COZIER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hom v. Zullo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 2004
7 A.D.3d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Hom v. Zullo

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE HOM, appellant, v. JANE ZULLO, respondent. (Docket…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 886