From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Hart

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Mar 4, 1996
468 S.E.2d 76 (S.C. 1996)

Opinion

24385

Submitted January 31, 1996

Decided March 4, 1996 Rehearing Denied April 8, 1996

Attorney General Charles Molony Condon and Senior Assistant Attorney General Nathan Kaminski, Jr., Columbia, for complainant.

Desa Ballard, Charleston, for respondent.


In this attorney grievance matter, respondent has conditionally admitted to the allegations against him and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the conditional admission and publicly reprimand respondent.

Respondent admits that he terminated his representation of a client and referred her case and file to another law firm without her prior approval and consent. He further admits that he failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing the client. He failed to take any substantial action in the case for nearly three years and he failed to insure that process was served on the defendant before the statute of limitations had run. These delays ultimately resulted in a grant of summary judgment against the client.

By his conduct, respondent has failed to provide competent representation to his client; failed to abide by his client's decisions concerning the objectives of representation; failed to consult with the client as to the means by which those objectives were to be pursued; failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing the client; failed to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of a matter; failed to obtain the client's consent, after consultation, before revealing information relating to representation; improperly withdrawn from representing the client; failed to take reasonably practicable steps to protect his client's interests upon termination of representation; and engaged in conduct demonstrating a lack of professional competence in the practice of law.

Accordingly, we publicly reprimand respondent for his conduct in this matter.

Public reprimand.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Hart

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Mar 4, 1996
468 S.E.2d 76 (S.C. 1996)
Case details for

In the Matter of Hart

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael A. Hart, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 4, 1996

Citations

468 S.E.2d 76 (S.C. 1996)
468 S.E.2d 76

Citing Cases

In re Carter

We therefore hold a public reprimand is appropriate under these circumstances. See In re DePew, 350 S.C. 265,…