From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Guzenski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 2005
20 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

July 21, 2005.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 28, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


Claimant lost his job at an automobile transmission shop after he failed to report for a scheduled shift. He filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits. Subsequently, at claimant's urging, the employer agreed to rehire him. Claimant, however, did not report to work on the date specified or thereafter. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately disqualified him from receiving benefits on the ground that he refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause, and adhered to this decision upon reconsideration. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. A claimant who refuses to accept a job for which he or she is reasonably suited by training and experience will be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits ( see Labor Law § 593; Matter of Spina [Commissioner of Labor], 7 AD3d 870, 870; Matter of Turner [Commissioner of Labor], 6 AD3d 915, 916). Here, the employer's representative testified that, after rehiring claimant for the same job he had performed previously upon conditions that were mutually acceptable, claimant inexplicably failed to report to work. Although claimant maintained that he did not accept the offer because the employer intended to pay him illegally, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see Matter of Fronczak [Commissioner of Labor], 6 AD3d 898, 899, appeal dismissed 3 NY3d 669; Matter of Hill [Commissioner of Labor], 305 AD2d 843, 844).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Guzenski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 21, 2005
20 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Guzenski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ERIC A. GUZENSKI, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 580

Citing Cases

Stehnach v. Comm'r. of Labor

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that claimant was…

In the Matter of Fair v. Commissioner of Labor

Although claimant has not appealed from the subsequent decision, it is reviewable on this appeal as it is…