From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Gorenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 14, 2002
809 A.2d 136 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

November 14, 2002


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-088, concluding that DAVID M. GORENBERG of MOORESTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 1.16(d) (failure to take steps reasonably necessary to protect client's interests);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit proof of his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID M. GORENBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that within three months from the filing date of this Order, respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics proof of respondent's fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Gorenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 14, 2002
809 A.2d 136 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Gorenberg

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID M. GORENBERG, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 14, 2002

Citations

809 A.2d 136 (N.J. 2002)
809 A.2d 136