From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Gilbert C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 2005
15 A.D.3d 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5234

February 1, 2005.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered October 30, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and Williams, JJ., concur.


The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility ( see People v. Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). The victim provided a credible account of the incident.

There is no basis for preclusion, on the ground of inadequate notice under Family Court Act § 330.2 (2), of the victim's in-court identification of appellant, since appellant nevertheless moved to suppress the identification and received a full hearing ( see People v. Kirkland, 89 NY2d 903). In any event, no notice was required in the first place, since the record establishes that the identification procedure conducted by a school official was not police-arranged ( see Matter of Gabriel A., 12 AD3d 666).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Gilbert C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 2005
15 A.D.3d 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Gilbert C

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GILBERT C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
788 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

In re Andy F.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, there was no testimony or evidence from the Wade hearing ( see United…

In the Matter of Felix D

The appellant's motion papers essentially alleged only, in conclusory fashion, that the identification…