From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Garrick B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2006
30 A.D.3d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Summary

holding that conduct constituted OGA where individual "interrupted a police interview of a complainant by screaming obscenities at the police, and then refused to comply with the officers' directives to leave, physically menaced an officer, screamed, cursed, flailed his arms and struggled with the officers"

Summary of this case from Hilderbrandt v. City of N.Y.

Opinion

8764.

June 13, 2006.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and resisting arrest, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Presentment Agency Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for presentment agency.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ., Concur.


The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Contrary to appellant's argument, the evidence established his intent to obstruct a governmental function or prevent a public servant from performing an official function, an essential element of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (Penal Law § 195.05). Appellant interrupted a police interview of a complainant by screaming obscenities at the police, and then refused to comply with the officers' directives to leave, physically menaced an officer, screamed, cursed, flailed his arms and struggled with the officers. The evidence supports the conclusion that appellant intended to cause the natural consequences of his acts ( see People v. Getch, 50 NY2d 456, 465).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Garrick B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2006
30 A.D.3d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

holding that conduct constituted OGA where individual "interrupted a police interview of a complainant by screaming obscenities at the police, and then refused to comply with the officers' directives to leave, physically menaced an officer, screamed, cursed, flailed his arms and struggled with the officers"

Summary of this case from Hilderbrandt v. City of N.Y.
Case details for

In the Matter of Garrick B

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GARRICK B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4769
816 N.Y.S.2d 462

Citing Cases

People v. Santi D

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see…

People v. Ronnell

A police officer is entitled, and in fact is duty-bound, to take action on a radio call ( see People v…