From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Follum v. Follum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 2005
20 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

July 1, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), entered May 14, 2004. The order dismissed the petition, by which petitioner sought visitation with his grandchildren.

Before: Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition, by which petitioner sought visitation with his grandchildren ( see generally Domestic Relations Law § 72; Matter of Emanuel S. v. Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178, 181-183) over the objections of respondent, the children's mother. The evidence adduced at the hearing on the petition established that there is no existing relationship between the children and petitioner, their paternal grandfather, and that there is deep animosity between petitioner and respondent ( see Matter of Eggleton v. Clark, 11 AD3d 459, 460-461; Matter of Ziarno v. Ziarno, 285 AD2d 793, 794-796, lv denied 97 NY2d 605; Matter of Wenskoski v. Wenskoski, 266 AD2d 762, 763-764; see also Matter of Wilson v. McGlinchey, 2 NY3d 375, 381-382). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Follum v. Follum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 2005
20 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Follum v. Follum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WARREN RICHARD FOLLUM, SR., Appellant, v. JOYCE ANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 1, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 331

Citing Cases

In re Follum v. Follum

Decided November 22, 2005. Appeal from 4th Dept: 20 AD3d 886. Appeal dismissed on constitutional…

Danial v. Ledyard

In any event, petitioner did not establish that the animosity between petitioner and respondents was…