From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ferraiolo

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 2002
170 N.J. 600 (N.J. 2002)

Opinion

February 22, 2002


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-139, concluding that DONALD M. FERRAIOLO OF HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period one year pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), respondent having pleaded guilty to a one-count accusation charging him with attempted endangering of the welfare of a child in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:5-1 and N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further determined that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent should be required to provide proof that he is fit to practice law, as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DONALD M. FERRAIOLO is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective March 19, 2002; and it is further

ORDERED that entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ferraiolo

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 2002
170 N.J. 600 (N.J. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ferraiolo

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DONALD M. FERRAIOLO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 2002

Citations

170 N.J. 600 (N.J. 2002)
790 A.2d 883

Citing Cases

In re Legato

The attorney invited the boy to meet with him, but never finalized that plan. In determining the appropriate…

In re Nilsen

In one matter, an attorney contacted an undercover officer, who was posing as a fourteen-year-old child. In…