From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Fernald v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03478

Submitted April 24, 2003.

May 12, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, dated July 25, 2001, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner's request to expunge certain reports maintained in the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment.

Robert Vara, Carmel, N.Y., for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Marion Buchbinder and Daniel J. Chepaitis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

To annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, the court must be satisfied, after reviewing the record as a whole, that it lacks substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Vallebuona v. Kerik, 294 A.D.2d 44; see also Matter of Siano v. Dolce, 256 A.D.2d 582). Substantial evidence has been defined as "such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact" (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 180). Thus, it is more than mere surmise, conjecture, or speculation, but less than a preponderance of the evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, supra, at 180-181). In this case, there is substantial evidence to support the determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services that, at the hearing, it was proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the petitioner committed the acts of maltreatment alleged in certain reports maintained in the Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, thereby precluding the expungement of those records.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Fernald v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Fernald v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF LOUANN FERNALD, petitioner, v. JOHN A. JOHNSON, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 529

Citing Cases

People v. Metropolitan Surety Co.

The same rule is applied in other states. ( Goding v. Roscenthal, 180 Mass. 43, 44; Attorney-General v.…

Montgomery v. Phillips Petroleum

The difference is simply that which exists between a conditional debt or liability and none at all. Fernald…