From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Dworsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 2005
14 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

D-02-05

January 13, 2005.

Per Curiam. Respondent, a Schenectady County attorney, was suspended from practice by this Court in December 2003 for three years, effective October 15, 2001 ( Matter of Dworsky, 2 AD3d 1205). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner does not oppose the application.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


We conclude that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court's rules governing reinstatement ( see 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the character and fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Dworsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 2005
14 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Dworsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROGER L. DWORSKY, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 13, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
786 N.Y.S.2d 923