From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Dolan v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 2005
24 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97429.

December 29, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered July 12, 2004 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to timely serve respondent and the Attorney General in accordance with the order to show cause. Supreme Court granted the motion to dismiss the petition and this appeal ensued.

Respondent now withdraws his objection to the timeliness of service based upon the discovery of a second order to show cause apparently issued after it was determined that petitioner was not given sufficient time for service pursuant to the first order to show cause. Inasmuch as respondent was not given an opportunity to submit an answer, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to Supreme Court ( see Matter of Burr v. Goord, 290 AD2d 611, 612, lv dismissed 97 NY2d 749; Matter of Ali v. Goord, 267 AD2d 520, 521).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied and matter remitted to the Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 15 days of the date of this Court's decision.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Dolan v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 2005
24 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Dolan v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RORY DOLAN, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 1121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
806 N.Y.S.2d 782

Citing Cases

Sital v. Fischer

Respondents now withdraw their objection to the timeliness of service based upon the discovery of a notarized…