From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Diaz v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 2005
19 A.D.3d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

96736.

June 16, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Wilfredo Diaz, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of attempted smuggling and possession of contraband in violation of prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Burgos v. Miller, 1 AD3d 873).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Diaz v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 2005
19 A.D.3d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Diaz v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILFREDO DIAZ, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 170

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Jenkins v. Goord

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

In the Matter of Hurley v. Goord

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…