From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Dexter Washington v. Lippman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2006
30 A.D.3d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8871.

June 22, 2006.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered November 15, 2005, denying the application in the nature of mandamus to compel respondents to vacate a corrected sentence and commitment record which reflected that petitioner had been sentenced as a second violent felony offender, and to immediately release him from custody, and dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dexter Washington, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York (Megan P. Davis of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ., Concur.


The court properly held that petitioner's claims are barred by collateral estoppel, as they are the same claims that petitioner unsuccessfully litigated in a habeas corpus proceeding in Cayuga County ( see Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343, 349). The court also properly held that petitioner failed to join necessary parties ( see CPLR 1001 [a]; Matter of Lodge v. D'Aliso, 2 AD3d 525, lv denied 2 NY3d 702). In any event, all of petitioner's underlying claims are without merit.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Dexter Washington v. Lippman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2006
30 A.D.3d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Dexter Washington v. Lippman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEXTER WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. JONATHAN LIPPMAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5104
818 N.Y.S.2d 38

Citing Cases

Washington v. Goord

(Id. at ¶ 17.) The Court takes judicial notice of this fact, which was recited in a judicial order dismissing…

Washington v. State

Claimant's habeas petition was later dismissed as "entirely lacking in merit." Claimant thereafter mounted a…