From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Destefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 2006
26 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-08588.

February 21, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County dated January 29, 2004, which adopted the recommendation and findings of a hearing officer dated January 13, 2004, made after a hearing, that the petitioner was guilty of misconduct, and terminated her employment.

Vitale and Levitt, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Paul E. Levitt of counsel), for petitioner.

Ingerman Smith, LLP, Northport, N.Y. (Anna M. Scricca of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that so much of the determination as imposed a penalty terminating the petitioner's employment is annulled, the petition is otherwise denied, the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, the determination is otherwise confirmed, and the matter is remitted to the respondent for the imposition of an appropriate penalty less severe than termination of the petitioner's employment.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination that she was guilty of misconduct relating to her physical altercation with a coworker was supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Maher v. Cade, 15 AD3d 489; Matter of Mann v. Town of Monroe, 2 AD3d 527). However, inter alia, in light of her otherwise unblemished 14-year record of employment the penalty of termination of her employment was so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222). Accordingly, we grant the petition to the extent of annulling so much of the determination as imposed a penalty of termination of employment, and remit the matter to the respondent for the imposition of a penalty less severe than termination.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Destefano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 2006
26 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Destefano

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KAREN DESTEFANO, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COOPERATIVE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1297
809 N.Y.S.2d 203

Citing Cases

Destefano v. Board

The petitioner then commenced a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determinations of BOCES.…

Caroli v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Courts have repeatedly found the penalty of termination to be disproportionate to the offense and shocking to…