From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Cooper v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 30, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 500037.

November 30, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered October 27, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


While incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility in Chemung County, petitioner sent a letter to his wife requesting her to send $30 to another inmate housed at the correctional facility. The letter was opened by a correction official and petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, soliciting and violating facility correspondence procedures. He was found guilty of all charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination on procedural grounds. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Petitioner contends that the determination must be annulled because correction officials did not obtain the authorization of the superintendent of the facility to open his mail as required by Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4422 ( see 7 NYCRR 720.3 [e]). The evidence, however, demonstrates otherwise. The correction official who opened petitioner's mail testified that she had authorization from the superintendent, and the confidential information further established that the superintendent gave written authorization. As petitioner raises no question of substantial evidence and his other contentions either have not been preserved or are lacking in merit, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Cooper v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 30, 2006
34 A.D.3d 1133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Cooper v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BERNARD COOPER, Appellant, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 1133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
824 N.Y.S.2d 490

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fischer

We find petitioner's arguments to be without merit. A review of the confidential information considered by…

Devivo v. Bezio

Furthermore, 7 NYCRR 720.3 (b) (3) requires advance approval of inmate mail directed to inmates in other…