From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Collins v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04899

Submitted April 15, 2003.

May 19, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection dated October 29, 1998, demoting the petitioner from his position as Administrative Staff Analyst M-II to Administrative Staff Analyst M-I, Joel A. Miele, Sr., William N. Stasiuk, Diana Chapin, Charles Sturcken, Robert Chicoloa, and the City of New York appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated March 20, 2002, as granted that branch of the petition which was to direct them to reinstate the petitioner to the position of Administrative Staff Analyst M-II forthwith.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo, Dona B. Morris, and Paul Marks of counsel), for appellants.

Lovett Gould, White Plains, N.Y. (Jonathan Lovett and Kim Berg of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the petition which was to direct the appellants to reinstate the petitioner to the position of Administrative Staff Analyst M-II forthwith is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

It is well settled that "[a] resignation constitutes a complete break in the service, and the absolute termination of relations. Thereafter the person resigning has no rights or duties. Reentry into the service can be accomplished only by the voluntary act of the person who has power of appointment" (Matter of Doering v. Hinrichs, 289 N.Y. 29, 33; see Matter of Mosca v. Barclay, 114 A.D.2d 1034; Matter of McGill v. D'Ambrose, 58 A.D.2d 604). Here, since the petitioner resigned during the pendency of this proceeding, and he never amended this petition to challenge the voluntariness of his resignation, that branch of his petition which was to direct the appellants to reinstate the petitioner to the position of Administrative Staff Analyst M-II forthwith should have been denied and the proceeding dismissed. The petitioner's contention that he did not voluntarily resign was not raised in a timely fashion (see CPLR 217).

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, KRAUSMAN and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Collins v. Miele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Collins v. Miele

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL COLLINS, respondent, v. JOEL A. MIELE, SR., ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 384

Citing Cases

Meyer v. Hogan

To the extent that the petitioner challenges the determination to terminate her probationary employment with…