From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Collazo v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 12, 2001
282 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 12, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Steven Collazo, Dannemora, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the administrative determination finding him guilty of violating the inmate disciplinary rules against harassment, interfering with an employee and refusing a direct order. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner disregarded the initial order of a facility nurse to stay behind the red line in the holding room. Thereafter, petitioner was heard making derogatory remarks, at which point the nurse ordered petitioner removed from the holding room. The detailed misbehavior report, written by the facility nurse involved in the incident, is sufficient, by itself, to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt on all charges (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966;Matter of Harrell v. O'Keefe, 241 A.D.2d 616). Although petitioner offered a differing version of the events and claimed that the remarks were not directed at the nurse at issue and presented witnesses to that effect, it was for the Hearing Officer to assess the credibility of the evidence presented (see, Matter of Morales v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 549; Matter of Tarbell v. Senkowski, 257 A.D.2d 875).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Collazo v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 12, 2001
282 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Collazo v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN COLLAZO, Petitioner v. DANIEL SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 12, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

Sharpe v. Selsky

Upon her subsequent inspection of petitioner's mouth, the nurse discovered that petitioner had not swallowed…

McKins v. James

We disagree. The detailed misbehavior report, written by the correction officer who was directly involved in…