From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Cole-Hatchard v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

94307.

Decided and Entered February 26, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered October 4, 2002 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motions to dismiss the petition.

Stephen J. Cole-Hatchard, Stony Point, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for H. Carl McCall, respondent.

John A. Costa, Town Attorney, New City (Ronald A. Longo of counsel), for Town of Clarkstown and another, respondents.

Before Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner, a member of respondent Town of Clarkstown Police Department, was injured on the job in 1997. His subsequent applications for accidental disability and performance of duty disability retirement benefits were denied and those denials were upheld on appeal ( Matter of Cole-Hatchard v. McCall, 305 A.D.2d 913, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 512). Similarly, his application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits was also denied and this denial was also upheld on appeal ( Matter of Cole-Hatchard v. Sherwood, 309 A.D.2d 933, lv dismissed 1 N.Y.2d 593 [Jan. 12, 2004]). In the instant matter, petitioner challenges the determination of respondent Comptroller denying him retirement system service credit for the period of time that he was out of work and receiving workers' compensation benefits for his job-related injury.

The procedure for challenging a retirement system service credit determination is to request a hearing and redetermination, and, if one is dissatisfied with the final determination, to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding ( see Marsh v. New York State Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 291 A.D.2d 713, 714). The record reflects that the Comptroller has granted petitioner's request for a hearing pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 374, albeit subsequent to the filing of the petition in this matter. As petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before commencing this proceeding, Supreme Court properly dismissed his petition against the Comptroller ( see CPLR 7801). In this context, we specifically reject petitioner's contention that constitutional issues are sufficiently implicated to justify an exception to the general rule that administrative remedies be exhausted prior to judicial review ( see Arbor Hill Partners v. New York State Commr. of Hous. Community Renewal, 267 A.D.2d 675, 676 n [1999]).

We also find that Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as to the municipal respondents. The gist of petitioner's claim against respondent Town of Clarkstown and its police department is that the method by which his workers' compensation benefits were paid had an adverse impact on the determination of his retirement service credits. Since the Comptroller has exclusive authority to determine such matters ( see Marsh v. New York State Local Employees' Retirement Sys., supra at 714), the appropriate forum for resolution of this aspect of petitioner's claim is the promised administrative hearing.

To the extent not specifically addressed, petitioner's remaining arguments have been considered and rejected.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Cole-Hatchard v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Cole-Hatchard v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN J. COLE-HATCHARD, Appellant, v. H. CARL McCALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 415

Citing Cases

In re John Connor

"It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available…

D'Agostino v. Dinapoli

Petitioner contends that his application for retirement was submitted and finally determined eight years ago…