From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Cadle v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2005
23 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-03251.

November 28, 2005.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, Thomas L. Hill appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Blass, J.), dated March 15, 2005, which confirmed a determination of the same court (Buetow, S.M.) dated February 25, 2005, finding, after a hearing, that he willfully failed to pay court-ordered child support, adjudicated him in contempt, and thereupon committed him to a period of incarceration of six months unless he purged himself of contempt by paying the sum of $19,774.65.

Henry O'Brien, Centereach, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: Cozier, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A Support Magistrate may assume an active role in the examination of witnesses where proper or necessary to facilitate or expedite the orderly progress of the hearing ( see Bielicki v. T.J. Bentey, Inc., 267 AD2d 266, 267; Givens v. Sinert, 243 AD2d 443, 444; Accardi v. City of New York, 121 AD2d 489, 491). As the Support Magistrate asked questions in order to clarify the appellant's testimony, she did not unduly interfere with the presentation of the appellant's case or indicate any partiality or bias which would warrant reversal.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Cadle v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2005
23 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Cadle v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KARRIELINN M. CADLE, Respondent, v. THOMAS L. HILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 9093
804 N.Y.S.2d 429

Citing Cases

Toumazatos v. Toumazatos

Furthermore, the Support Magistrate's questioning of the father was proper. A support magistrate may assume…

Toumazatos v. Toumazatos

Furthermore, the Support Magistrate's questioning of the father was proper. A support magistrate may assume…