From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Brittanie G

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 30, 2004
6 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

CAF 03-02618.

Decided April 30, 2004.

Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), entered September 26, 2003. The amended order adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed respondent in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

ARDETH L. HOUDE, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DANIEL M. DE LAUS, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT WILLIAM WESTERVELT OF COUNSEL), PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRO SE.

Before: PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court's finding that respondent committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute attempted assault in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [a]) is based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence establishes that respondent struck a school administrator on the head with a telephone receiver. "Respondent's intent to cause physical injury can be inferred from the conduct and surrounding circumstances" ( Matter of Margaret A.W., 1 A.D.3d 881; see Matter of Anthony S., 305 A.D.2d 689, 690). The court further found that respondent committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (§ 265.01 [2]). Respondent's contention regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence with respect to that finding is not preserved for our review ( see Matter of Yarras F., 5 A.D.3d 481 [Mar. 8, 2004]; Anthony S., 305 A.D.2d at 689-690; see generally People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to establish that the telephone receiver was a dangerous instrument ( see People v. Carter, 53 N.Y.2d 113, 116-117; People v. Becker, 298 A.D.2d 986, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 555; People v. McKoy, 258 A.D.2d 950, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 876; Matter of Jason J., 187 A.D.2d 652, 653, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 706), and that respondent intended to use it unlawfully ( see Margaret A.W., 1 A.D.3d 881; Anthony S., 305 A.D.2d at 690). We further conclude that the court's findings are not against the weight of the evidence.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Brittanie G

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 30, 2004
6 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Brittanie G

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF BRITTANIE G., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 30, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 702

Citing Cases

In re Jenna

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating her to be a juvenile delinquent based upon the…

People v. Westbrooks

Again viewing the evidence in light of the elements of assault in the second degree as charged to the jury…