From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Bermudez v. Grosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2003-02691

May 19, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the prosecution of Queens County Indictment Nos. 3917/00 and 3918/00, and application for poor person relief.

Isaias Bermudez, East Elmhurst, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (James A. Dolan of counsel), respondent pro se.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION, ORDER JUDGMENT

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Bermudez v. Grosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2003
305 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Bermudez v. Grosso

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ISAIAS BERMUDEZ, petitioner, v. JOSEPH GROSSO, ETC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 401