From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Berkowitz v. Harrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 2003
307 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Summary

In Matter of Berkowitz v. Harrington (307 AD2d 1002 [2nd Dept., 2003]) it was held that the failure to include in the "Witness Identification Information" section of the petition the town or city and county of the subscribing witness was not sufficient, in and of itself, to warrant invalidation of the petition, where the complete address of the subscribing witness appeared elsewhere on the same page of the petition.

Summary of this case from In Matter of Arcuri v. Hojnacki

Opinion

2003-07140

Argued August 19, 2003.

August 20, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Patricia A. Harrington as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 2003, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Receiver of Taxes, Town of North Hempstead, Patricia A. Harrington appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated August 13, 2003, which granted the petition and invalidated the designating petition.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the final order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Nassau County Board of Elections is directed to place the name of Patricia A. Harrington on the appropriate ballot.

The issue on this appeal is whether the Election Law requires the disqualification of signatures on a designating petition when the subscribing witness fails to include the name of the town or city, and the county, in which he or she resides, under the "Witness Identification Information" section. We conclude that the failure of the subscribing witness to include the town or city, and the county, in the "Witness Identification Information" section of the petition is insufficient, in and of itself, to warrant invalidation of the petition, particularly where, as here, the complete address of the subscribing witness appears elsewhere on the same page of the petition ( see Matter of Barrett v. Brodsky, 196 A.D.2d 603).

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Berkowitz v. Harrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 2003
307 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

In Matter of Berkowitz v. Harrington (307 AD2d 1002 [2nd Dept., 2003]) it was held that the failure to include in the "Witness Identification Information" section of the petition the town or city and county of the subscribing witness was not sufficient, in and of itself, to warrant invalidation of the petition, where the complete address of the subscribing witness appeared elsewhere on the same page of the petition.

Summary of this case from In Matter of Arcuri v. Hojnacki

designating petition — town or city in witness identification information section left blank — not fatal

Summary of this case from Curley v. Zacek
Case details for

In the Matter of Berkowitz v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN BERKOWITZ, petitioner-respondent, v. PATRICIA A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 20, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
763 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

Stark v. Kelleher

Petitioner's reliance on Matter of Curley u Zacek ( 22 AD3d 954, lv denied 5 NY3d 714) and Matter of…

McCrory v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

In any event, contrary to the petitioner's contention, the designating petition was not invalid due to the…