From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Antonucci v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2002
298 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-01113

Submitted September 19, 2002.

October 7, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to expunge certain allegedly inaccurate statements from the presentence report prepared in connection with the petitioner's criminal conviction under Rockland County Indictment No. 86-5-01, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated November 24, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Vincent Antonucci, Coxsackie, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Marion R. Buchbinder and David Lawrence III of counsel), for respondents William K. Nelson and Glenn Goord.

Patricia Zugibe, County Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Patrick J. Carle of counsel), for respondents Joseph Forman and Michael Bongiorno.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking, inter alia, to compel the respondents to expunge certain allegedly inaccurate information in the presentence report prepared in connection with his 1986 convictions of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and menacing. The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. "[T]he challenges now made to the accuracy of the presentence report should have been raised before [the] sentencing [court]" (Matter of Sciaraffo v. New York City Dept. of Probation, 248 A.D.2d 477; see Matter of Salahuddin v. Mitchell, 232 A.D.2d 903).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Antonucci v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2002
298 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Antonucci v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF VINCENT ANTONUCCI, appellant, v. WILLIAM K. NELSON, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 395

Citing Cases

People v. Roberts

Similarly unavailing are the defendant's contentions regarding ineffective assistance of counsel (see People…

People v. Roberts

15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to…