From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 2005
19 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

June 16, 2005.

Per Curiam. Applicant passed the July 2002 New York State Bar exam and has been certified for admission to this Court by the New York State Board of Law Examiners.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


After holding a hearing on the application, the Committee on Character and Fitness issued a decision recommending that applicant be denied admission. Applicant now petitions this Court for an order granting his application for admission notwithstanding the Committee's decision ( see 22 NYCRR 805.1 [m]).

We deny the petition. Our review of the record indicates that the Committee fully and reasonably assessed applicant's character and fitness before disapproving his application for admission. The character and fitness concerns raised by the application include, inter alia, applicant's 1997 disbarment in New Jersey and his reciprocal 1998 disbarment in Indiana. In his consent to disbarment in New Jersey, applicant acknowledged that he could not successfully defend himself against charges that he knowingly misappropriated a client's trust funds. Under all the circumstances, we are not satisfied that applicant presently possesses the character and general fitness requisite for an attorney and counselor-at-law ( see Judiciary Law § 90 [a]).

Ordered that the petition is denied.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Anonymous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 2005
19 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Anonymous

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANONYMOUS, an Applicant for Admission to the Bar

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 151

Citing Cases

Munsiff v. Office of Court Administration

Petitioner presses the argument that in admitting him to the bar the Second Department necessarily found that…