From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Anderson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 7, 2002
299 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90351

November 7, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Tom Terrizzi, Prisoners' Legal Services, Albany (Gavin A. Cook of counsel), for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT


Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating prison disciplinary rule 113.25, which prohibits inmates from possessing or selling controlled substances or conspiring to introduce them into the facility, and rule 114.10, which prohibits inmates from smuggling or attempting to smuggle contraband into the facility. Specifically, the misbehavior report alleged that petitioner was engaged in a conspiracy to smuggle crack cocaine into the correctional facility at which he was incarcerated. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of the charges. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul respondent's determination.

Upon our review of the confidential materials introduced into evidence at the hearing, we are persuaded that the Hearing Officer indeed made an independent assessment of such evidence and deemed it to be both credible and reliable. We are further persuaded that the detailed and voluminous confidential materials, together with the testimony adduced at the administrative hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Almonte v. Goord, 295 A.D.2d 715). Accordingly, respondent's determination is confirmed.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Anderson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 7, 2002
299 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Anderson v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TYRONE ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 7, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Williams v. Goord

Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. Substantial…