From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ameen v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 26, 2006
25 A.D.3d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98707.

January 26, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Mikal Ameen, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon after a nail six inches in length and taped at one end was found in his locker. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, consisting of the misbehavior report, hearing testimony and documentary evidence, supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Vines v. Goord, 19 AD3d 951, 952; Matter of Sanchez v. Goord, 300 AD2d 956). The fact that the weapon was found in an area under petitioner's control supports the inference that it belonged to him ( see Matter of Charles v. Selsky, 13 AD3d 861, 862; Matter of Cummings v. Goord, 10 AD3d 748, 749). Petitioner's claim that the weapon had been planted by other inmates presented a credibility issue for the hearing officer to resolve ( see Matter of Alston v. Goord, 4 AD3d 708, 709).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ameen v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 26, 2006
25 A.D.3d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ameen v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MIKAL AMEEN, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 434
807 N.Y.S.2d 318

Citing Cases

Stolpinski v. State Deptartment

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report and testimony of the authoring correction officer provide…

In re Trisvan

The misbehavior report, together with the testimony presented at the hearing, provide substantial evidence…