From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 23, 2005
19 A.D.3d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97444.

June 23, 2005.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 4, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Couch White L.L.P., Albany (Jeremy M. Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.


Claimant was working at a life insurance company as the supervisor of a claims center when she was informed by two of her superiors that a female subordinate had made comments to two other employees threatening to physically harm her. Upon investigating the incident and concluding that the subordinate did not pose a real danger, the employer offered to transfer the subordinate from under claimant's supervision. Dissatisfied with the employer's handling of the matter, claimant resigned from her position. After various proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause, prompting this appeal.

Although fear for one's safety may constitute good cause for leaving employment, reasonable grounds must exist to support such a conclusion ( see Matter of Gully [Commissioner of Labor], 8 AD3d 792, 793, lv denied 4 NY3d 701; Matter of De Witt [Commissioner of Labor], 288 AD2d 601, 602). Here, the subordinate told claimant that she did not mean what she had said and the contact that claimant had with the subordinate after the incident was uneventful. Moreover, the employer made efforts to accommodate claimant by offering her a different parking spot, changing her work schedule and transferring the subordinate, all to no avail. Under these circumstances, we find no basis to disturb the Board's finding that claimant left her job for personal and noncompelling reasons.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 23, 2005
19 A.D.3d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Alexander

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SHARON B. ALEXANDER, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
797 N.Y.S.2d 610

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Smith

We affirm. Claimant correctly asserts that fear for one's personal safety may constitute good cause for…