From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ackridge v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-10504.

April 4, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Samuel Walker, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to determine the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, inter alia, to vacate a judgment rendered October 8, 2003, in People v. Ackridge, under Westchester County indictment No. 03-0573.

Ronald M. Ackridge, Ogdensburg, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Ghartey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated January 13, 2006, the Supreme Court, Westchester County, denied the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. The present proceeding is therefore academic.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ackridge v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ackridge v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONALD M. ACKRIDGE, Petitioner, v. SAMUEL WALKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2535
811 N.Y.S.2d 578