From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN THE MATTER, BUCCI v. ADIRONDACK PARK AG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 03-00934.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Kirk, J.), entered March 20, 2003, which granted the CPLR article 78 petition and ordered respondent to process petitioners' after-the-fact permit application.

ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAWRENCE A. RAPPOPORT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

POKLEMBA, HOBBS ULASEWICZ, LLC, SARATOGA SPRINGS (THOMAS A. ULASEWICZ OF COUNSEL, FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

Before: PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Same Memorandum as in Adirondack Park Agency v. Bucci ( 2 A.D.3d 1293).


Summaries of

IN THE MATTER, BUCCI v. ADIRONDACK PARK AG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

IN THE MATTER, BUCCI v. ADIRONDACK PARK AG

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF JOHN A. BUCCI AND LINDA L. BUCCI, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 895