At the hearing, the juvenile court judge, who acknowledged being 74 himself, noted that "logic tells us that" a significantly younger adult would have a more ease of caregiving and a better chance of living beyond the child's age of majority. See generally In the Interest of S. S., 267 Ga.App. 601, 603 (600 S.E.2d 679) (2004) (noting advanced age can be weighed against a potential custodian in connection with a termination of parental rights). See In the Interest of L. H., 370 Ga.App. at 597 (affirming the juvenile court's choice between two "good families").

Accordingly, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in permanently placing R. D. B. with his foster parents. See In the Interest of K. W., supra, 283 Ga. App. at 403 (2); In the Interest of S. S., 267 Ga. App. 601, 603 ( 600 SE2d 679) (2004). 3. Finally, the mother argues that the juvenile court erred in failing to assess the impact of separating R. D. B. from his siblings and in refusing to allow the grandmother to visit with the child.

(Citation and footnote omitted.) In the Interest of S. S., 267 Ga. App. 601, 603 ( 600 SE2d 679) (2004). The record shows that the juvenile court repeatedly questioned the mother about any suitable relatives and discovered none.

See, e.g., In the Interest of S.S., 267 Ga. App. 601 ( 600 SE2d 679) (2004); In the Interest of A.L.S.S., 264 Ga. App. 318, 324-326 ( 590 SE2d 763) (2003); In the Interest of D.T., 251 Ga. App. 839, 844-845 (2) ( 555 SE2d 215) (2001); In the Interest of C.L.R., 232 Ga. App. 134, 139 (3) ( 501 SE2d 296) (1998). Judgment affirmed. Ruffin, P.J., and Eldridge, J., concur.