See In the Interest of T. J., 281 Ga. App. 673, 676 (1) ( 637 SE2d 75) (2006) (termination of parental rights was in the best interests of the children where the children needed permanency, stability, and a safe environment; the mother was unable to provide such an environment; the children had been in the care of DFCS for an extended period; and the foster parents, who expressed a desire to adopt the children, had bonded with them, given them a stable home, and provided for the children's medical needs). See In the Interest of C. A., 278 Ga. App. 93, 96 (2) ( 628 SE2d 151) (2006).Judgment affirmed.
(Citations and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of C. A., 278 Ga. App. 93, 96 (2) ( 628 SE2d 151) (2006). A juvenile court has broad discretion in determining how the interests of the children are best served.
[fn14] In the Interest of K. K,272 Ga. App. 45, 53 (611 SE2d 713) (2005). [fn15] In the Interest of C. A.,278 Ga. App. 93, 96 (2) (628 SE2d 151) (2006). [fn16] In the Interest of M. C,243 Ga. App. 707, 712 (2) (534 SE2d 442) (2000).
"A juvenile court has broad discretion in determining how the interests of the children are best served." In the Interest of C.A., 278 Ga. App. 93 ( 628 SE2d 151) (2006). See also In the Interest of M.L.P., 236 Ga. App. 504, 510 (1) (d) ( 512 SE2d 652) (1999).