Id. The mother relies on our decision in In the Interest of A.B., 263 Ga.App. 697, 699(1), 589 S.E.2d 264 (2003), to argue that the juvenile court could not rely on the abuse suffered by S.C.S. to find that A.W. is a dependent child. This reliance is misplaced.
, In the Interest of K. J., 226 Ga. App. at 307 (2) (b).In the Interest of A. B., 263 Ga. App. 697, 701 (2) ( 589 SE2d 264) (2003).See, e.g.
See In the Interest of C.D.E., 248 Ga. App. 756, 766 (2) ( 546 SE2d 837) (2001). See In the Interest of A.B., 263 Ga. App. 697, 701 (2) ( 589 SE2d 264) (2003) (physical precedent only); In the Interest of C.D.E., supra. DFCS's petition might have formed a legitimate basis for finding S.J. deprived.