From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Mooney v. Achord

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
May 1, 2018
Cause number: 01-18-00096-CV (Tex. App. May. 1, 2018)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-18-00096-CV

05-01-2018

In the Estate of Carolyn F. Mooney v. Charles W. Achord


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant's Brief If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A
Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A
Date Requested: May 9, 2018
Ordered that motion is:
[ ] Granted in part
[v] Denied (without prejudice)
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[v] Other: __________
Although the clerk's record was filed on March 26, 2018, the records are not due until May 3, 2018, and the court reporter's April 27, 2018 info sheet states that the reporter's record has not yet been filed, but has just been requested and paid for. Accordingly, appellant's premature extension request is denied without prejudice to refiling after the reporter's record has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2). If appellant does not need the reporter's record for the brief, appellant must file a docketing statement, which was due by February 27, 2018, stating that no reporter's record will be requested. See id. 32.1(h).
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: May 1, 2018 November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

Estate of Mooney v. Achord

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
May 1, 2018
Cause number: 01-18-00096-CV (Tex. App. May. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Estate of Mooney v. Achord

Case Details

Full title:In the Estate of Carolyn F. Mooney v. Charles W. Achord

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

Cause number: 01-18-00096-CV (Tex. App. May. 1, 2018)